City of London Corporation - ConserveConnect

ConserveConnect

Sign in Subscribe

City of London Corporation

A collection of 5 posts

Who Captures Liverpool Street? A Political Economy of Network Rail & ACME

Asset monetisation Featured

Who Captures Liverpool Street? A Political Economy of Network Rail & ACME

Part III: Value Capture, Governance, and the Station First Alternative Liverpool Street is not merely a station in need of repair. It is a public node that generates value, 94.5 million passengers in 2023 moving through a 5.6 hectare estate held largely freehold by Network Rail and TfL.

Liverpool Street and the Art of Dismissing the Public

City of London Corporation Featured

Liverpool Street and the Art of Dismissing the Public

“First the Chair called the objections ‘repetition’. Then he called them ‘copy and paste’. That is how democratic evidence becomes noise.”

Who Captures Liverpool Street? A Political Economy of Network Rail & ACME - Part II

ACME Architects Featured

Who Captures Liverpool Street? A Political Economy of Network Rail & ACME - Part II

Without a station first baseline, without a clearly costed and deliverable minimum scope that could be pursued without the commercial overbuild, the city cannot honestly judge what it is buying and what it is surrendering.

Who Captures Liverpool Street? A Political Economy of Network Rail & ACME - Part I

ACME Architects Featured

Who Captures Liverpool Street? A Political Economy of Network Rail & ACME - Part I

Liverpool Street Station’s redevelopment has now been approved, a 19–3 vote taken under conditions that made “public benefit” feel both decisive and strangely unmeasurable. In our previous report we showed how the hearing’s structure rationed democratic time, how key benefit claims shifted under questioning, and how the

Liverpool Street Station Approved — A 19–3 Vote, and the Managed Uncertainty of “Public Benefit”

Liverpool Street Station Featured

Liverpool Street Station Approved — A 19–3 Vote, and the Managed Uncertainty of “Public Benefit”

"A funding model presented as inevitable, without a transparent baseline, shifts risk to the public and certainty to the developer."