31 Jul 2025 3 min read Cultural Commons

Brick Lane Is a Battleground: Organising Against Erasure in the Heart of London

How resistance in East London draws from radical history, community solidarity, and the right to shape the city.

“They shall not pass.” That was the chant in 1936 as working-class East Londoners, trade unionists, Jews, communists, and dockers barricaded Cable Street to stop a fascist march. Nearly a century later, the slogan still holds—only now, the aggressor is a development proposal, not a blackshirt parade.

The proposed office-led redevelopment of the Truman Brewery site on Brick Lane has sparked an uprising that echoes the past. A coalition of artists, residents, campaigners, and historians are fighting to preserve not just a place, but a politics. Brick Lane has always been a space of refuge, resistance, and radicalism—and today, it is once again a frontline in the battle for urban justice.

A Legacy of Resistance

The cultural memory of Brick Lane is not passive. It is active, defiant, and often undocumented. Sarah Glynn’s From Cable Street to Brick Lane (2001) is one of the most essential texts chronicling this spirit of mobilisation. She writes:

“Resistance in the East End has never been about isolated campaigns. It has always been a response to systematic exclusion—by race, by class, and by design.”

Glynn’s anthology connects the dots between fascism in the 1930s, anti-racist organising in the 1970s, and the enduring power of collective action. It reminds us that Brick Lane has never been gentrified without a fight.

Culture as Counter-Narrative

In 2007, members of the local Bangladeshi community produced The Battle of Brick Lane, a short film in response to Monica Ali’s novel and the alienation it provoked. The film gave voice to those who felt spoken over—those whose families built Brick Lane but found themselves caricatured in literary markets and ignored in policy debates.

This tradition continues in the Save Brick Lane campaign, where community exhibitions, oral histories, and protest materials become tools of political storytelling. As organisers write:

“We are not against change. But change without us is erasure. Our history is not for sale.”
— Save Brick Lane Campaign

Brick Lane and the Global City

What’s happening on Brick Lane is not just local. It is part of a global pattern of displacement that urban theorist Ananya Roy describes as the “unmaking of the commons.” In her essay Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning, Roy writes:

“Insurgent planning is not invited by the city. It emerges where residents contest the authority of market-based planning regimes.”

The residents of Tower Hamlets are not asking permission to belong. They are asserting that they already do.

The Right to the City

This uprising is underwritten by theory as well as memory. David Harvey, in his foundational essay The Right to the City (2008), argued:

“The right to the city is far more than the individual liberty to access urban resources: it is a right to change ourselves by changing the city.”

The Truman Brewery redevelopment—designed without local consent, driven by commercial gain, and couched in sterile design language—offers no such right. What it proposes is a city for the investor, not the inhabitant.

Campaigners are invoking Harvey’s logic when they demand not just consultation, but co-creation. They don’t want heritage preserved. They want it lived.

Radical History on Every Corner

Walk the East End with David Rosenberg’s Rebel Footprints in hand and you’ll find markers of resistance: where suffragettes met, where dockers struck, where Black and Brown youth fought back against racist violence. Brick Lane is part of that walking archive.

“The streets of London are textbooks. We just need to learn how to read them.”
— Rebel Footprints (2019)

Campaigners are not resisting development because they reject the future. They are resisting because they remember the past—and they know that urban “renewal” has too often meant cultural removal.

The Present Struggle: Community or Clearance?

In The London Clearances (2023), urban geographer Loretta Lees documents the ways austerity and neoliberalism have weaponised “regeneration” to displace low-income and minority communities. Her case studies read like blueprints of the Brick Lane proposal: glossy renderings, lack of affordable space, tokenised public engagement, and the slow death of street-level life.

As one campaigner told us:

“We don’t want a mall. We want our market. We want what’s already here to be supported, not swept aside.”

Organising Tools and Today’s Campaigns

The current movement is held together not just by ideas, but by action.

East End Trades Guild defends independent businesses and calls for fairer commercial rents.
Nijjor Manush, a South Asian-led grassroots collective, connects housing justice with racial justice.
The Save Brick Lane Campaign has lodged thousands of objections, held public exhibitions, and generated national media attention.

This is what insurgent planning looks like: community groups reclaiming planning processes, reframing heritage, and refusing to be erased.

The Fight Is Not Just for Brick Lane

To defend Brick Lane is to defend the idea that London still belongs to the people who built it. It is to say: heritage is not a marketing device. It is memory. It is meaning. It is community held in place.

So where is the Mayor of London? Where is the Labour Party? And what do their silences mean?

The people are speaking. The question now is who’s listening.

📌 Take Action